BMVP vs. CTEF

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. BMVP is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. Over the past year, BMVP returned 14.21% vs 64.91% for CTEF. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BMVP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.

Performance

BMVP vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 39.43% return.

BMVP

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 4.17%
• 6M: 4.62%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 1Y: 14.21%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 7.33%
• 10Y*: 9.65%
• ALL TIME*: 3.00%

CTEF

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 33.15%
• YTD: 39.43%
• 1Y: 64.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 72.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	$45.66K	$65.59K	$59.39K
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	$609.04K	$738.74K	$391.83K

BMVP vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	11.70%	3.98%
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	39.43%	33.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and CTEF is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

BMVP vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 51
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 92
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMVP vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMVP	CTEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.77	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	3.61	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.45	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	4.35	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	18.36	-11.75

BMVP vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the CTEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and CTEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and CTEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMVP	CTEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-15.00%	-63.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-15.00%	+8.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-1.35%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.95%	-1.97%	-33.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.55%	-1.39%

Volatility

BMVP vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 3.48%, while Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMVP	CTEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	6.94%	-3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.40%	19.68%	-12.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	23.56%	-13.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	22.68%	-6.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.74%	22.68%	-3.94%

BMVP vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMVP vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than CTEF's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.70%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.05%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMVP and CTEF in my portfolio?

BMVP and CTEF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMVP or CTEF?

CTEF has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to BMVP (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs CTEF's -15.00%.

Which ETF is better, BMVP or CTEF?

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 64.91% vs 14.21% for BMVP. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BMVP or CTEF?

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 64.91% return vs 14.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMVP or CTEF?

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMVP or CTEF?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.05% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between BMVP and CTEF?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.45% for CTEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.