PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMSLX vs. GENIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) and Gotham Enhanced Return Fund (GENIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BMSLX at 13.91% and GENIX at 13.91%.


BMSLX

1D
0.78%
1M
5.44%
YTD
13.91%
6M
13.69%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

GENIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.37%
YTD
13.91%
6M
14.63%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
26.90%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMSLX
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund
13.91%8.08%19.25%19.81%-13.70%26.54%10.44%30.21%-11.11%18.04%
GENIX
Gotham Enhanced Return Fund
13.91%21.16%27.31%25.26%-12.02%39.66%-8.21%21.54%-5.97%18.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BMSLX and GENIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2016

0.85

The correlation between BMSLX and GENIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMSLX vs. GENIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMSLX
BMSLX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BMSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BMSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GENIX
GENIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GENIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GENIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) and Gotham Enhanced Return Fund (GENIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMSLXGENIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.95

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

21.97

-13.41

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMSLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the GENIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMSLX and GENIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMSLXGENIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.65

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.04

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Drawdowns

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMSLX drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum GENIX drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMSLX and GENIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMSLXGENIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-39.35%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-6.44%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-19.20%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.28%

-20.74%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.65%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.44%

+1.24%

Volatility

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Gotham Enhanced Return Fund (GENIX) at 2.62%. This indicates that BMSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GENIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMSLXGENIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.62%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

8.90%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

12.01%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

17.19%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

18.53%

+1.20%

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMSLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GENIX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMSLX vs. GENIX - Dividend Comparison

BMSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than GENIX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMSLX
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund
2.71%3.08%10.98%2.32%5.15%23.06%0.94%4.90%8.27%2.63%0.47%0.00%
GENIX
Gotham Enhanced Return Fund
1.82%2.07%19.28%9.82%8.02%19.31%0.14%32.49%9.60%0.97%0.00%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMSLX and GENIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMSLX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to GENIX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMSLX dropped -41.06% vs GENIX's -39.35%.

GENIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMSLX and GENIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer