PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMSLX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMSLX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
13.64%
6M
13.28%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*

ATGAX

1D
-0.36%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMSLX and ATGAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMSLX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMSLX
BMSLX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BMSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BMSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund (BMSLX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMSLXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMSLXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

18.80

-18.20

Drawdowns

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMSLX drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMSLX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMSLXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-0.36%

-40.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.36%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-0.09%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

Volatility

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMSLXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

11.18%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

11.18%

+7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

11.18%

+8.54%

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMSLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMSLX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

BMSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BMSLX
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Equity Fund
2.71%3.08%10.98%2.32%5.15%23.06%0.94%4.90%8.27%2.63%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMSLX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMSLX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer