BMQSX vs. FHUGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMQSX (Baird Municipal Bond Fund) and FHUGX (Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, BMQSX returned 1.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FHUGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMQSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FHUGX.

Performance

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Municipal Bond Fund (BMQSX) and Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BMQSX having a 1.35% return and FHUGX slightly lower at 1.32%.

BMQSX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 7.01%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

FHUGX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 7.27%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BMQSX Baird Municipal Bond Fund	1.35%	4.44%	2.68%	6.67%	-7.78%	3.12%	9.58%	1.16%
FHUGX Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A	1.32%	4.91%	1.33%	6.52%	-11.00%	2.16%	4.28%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BMQSX and FHUGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019	0.88

The correlation between BMQSX and FHUGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BMQSX vs. FHUGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMQSX

BMQSX Risk / Return Rank: 73
BMQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BMQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BMQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BMQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BMQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FHUGX

FHUGX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FHUGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FHUGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FHUGX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FHUGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FHUGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Municipal Bond Fund (BMQSX) and Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMQSX	FHUGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	2.64	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	3.99	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.66	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.26	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	7.55	+1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMQSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the FHUGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMQSX and FHUGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMQSX	FHUGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	2.64	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.13	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.52	+0.18

Drawdowns

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMQSX drawdown since its inception was -12.76%, smaller than the maximum FHUGX drawdown of -16.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMQSX and FHUGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMQSX	FHUGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-16.44%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-3.19%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.08%	-6.14%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.76%	-16.44%	+3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.88%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-3.96%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.95%	-0.19%

Volatility

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Municipal Bond Fund (BMQSX) is 0.88%, while Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that BMQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHUGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMQSX	FHUGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	1.13%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.77%	2.15%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27%	2.74%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.57%	4.13%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.46%	4.50%	-0.04%

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMQSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FHUGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMQSX vs. FHUGX - Dividend Comparison

BMQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than FHUGX's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BMQSX Baird Municipal Bond Fund	3.20%	3.18%	3.47%	3.22%	2.31%	2.33%	3.74%	0.16%	0.00%
FHUGX Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A	2.77%	3.58%	2.63%	2.29%	1.79%	2.37%	2.67%	2.82%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMQSX and FHUGX in my portfolio?

BMQSX and FHUGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMQSX or FHUGX?

FHUGX has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to BMQSX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMQSX dropped -12.76% vs FHUGX's -16.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BMQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.