PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMPIX vs. DXNLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMPIX achieves a 16.98% return, which is significantly lower than DXNLX's 20.83% return.


BMPIX

1D
1.80%
1M
-3.61%
6M
5.84%
YTD
16.98%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.85%

DXNLX

1D
0.38%
1M
0.58%
6M
17.83%
YTD
20.83%
1Y
35.75%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
16.98%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
20.83%22.13%28.56%66.63%-40.88%32.49%58.90%46.34%-3.37%37.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BMPIX and DXNLX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.55

The correlation between BMPIX and DXNLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMPIX vs. DXNLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DXNLX
DXNLX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DXNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DXNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMPIXDXNLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.23

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

7.77

-5.90

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the DXNLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMPIX and DXNLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than DXNLX's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMPIX and DXNLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMPIXDXNLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-43.77%

-40.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-15.91%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-28.35%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-43.77%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-3.70%

-4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.04%

-8.65%

-15.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

4.56%

+2.32%

Volatility

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) is 10.17%, while Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that BMPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXNLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMPIXDXNLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

10.73%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

19.04%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.48%

23.10%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.70%

28.72%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.05%

28.96%

+3.09%

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMPIX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DXNLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMPIX vs. DXNLX - Dividend Comparison

BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than DXNLX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.55%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
0.82%2.31%0.17%0.00%0.00%7.43%12.20%0.00%8.79%7.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMPIX and DXNLX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXNLX has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to BMPIX (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMPIX dropped -84.22% vs DXNLX's -43.77%.

DXNLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMPIX and DXNLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer