BMOP vs. BKDV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BMOP (BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF) and BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMOP is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMOP charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BKDV.

Performance

BMOP vs. BKDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BMOP

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKDV

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 2.42%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 14.67%
• 1Y: 29.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMOP vs. BKDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF	1.98%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BMOP and BKDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

BMOP vs. BKDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 81
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMOP vs. BKDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMOP	BKDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.43	—

Drawdowns

BMOP vs. BKDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum BKDV drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and BKDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMOP	BKDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-15.49%	+12.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.51%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-2.34%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMOP	BKDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	12.31%	-8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.64%	15.72%	-12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.64%	15.72%	-12.08%

BMOP vs. BKDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BKDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMOP vs. BKDV - Dividend Comparison

BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than BKDV's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.53%	0.62%	0.27%
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMOP and BKDV in my portfolio?

BMOP and BKDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMOP or BKDV?

On fees, BMOP is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMOP or BKDV?

BMOP is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BKDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMOP or BKDV?

BMOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.53% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BMOP and BKDV?

BMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BKDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.60% for BKDV.