BMNZ vs. MSTX
BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. BMNZ is passively managed, while MSTX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for MSTX.
Performance
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -80.96% return.
BMNZ
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- 76.32%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 50.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX
- 1D
- -18.65%
- 1M
- -74.39%
- YTD
- -80.96%
- 6M
- -82.67%
- 1Y
- -98.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 29.97% | 15.30% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -80.96% | -58.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNZ and MSTX is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNZ vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTX
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.73 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and MSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.80% | -99.41% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -98.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.23% | -99.41% | +72.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.65% | -70.73% | +20.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 78.88% | — |
Volatility
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 49.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 117.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.04% | 145.63% | +41.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.04% | 167.82% | +19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.04% | 167.82% | +19.22% |
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNZ vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNZ nor MSTX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNZ and MSTX have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
BMNZ and MSTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMNZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 1.29% for MSTX.
Find the right allocation for BMNZ and MSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer