PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BME.L vs. KOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L) and Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BME.L achieves a 27.35% return, which is significantly higher than KOD.L's -9.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BME.L has underperformed KOD.L with an annualized return of 3.69%, while KOD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.44% annualized return.


BME.L

1D
3.48%
1M
11.38%
6M
28.88%
YTD
27.35%
1Y
-8.61%
3Y*
-23.04%
5Y*
-12.24%
10Y*
3.69%
ALL TIME*
2.47%

KOD.L

1D
-3.07%
1M
-6.25%
6M
-41.18%
YTD
-9.09%
1Y
-13.04%
3Y*
-17.54%
5Y*
-5.83%
10Y*
21.44%
ALL TIME*
-7.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BME.L
B&M European Value Retail SA
27.35%-49.21%-29.78%46.22%-32.26%36.12%40.39%48.71%-32.24%55.09%
KOD.L
Kodal Minerals plc
-9.09%-27.47%22.97%37.04%-12.34%193.33%144.19%-66.41%-34.36%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BME.L and KOD.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BME.L:

£2.09B

KOD.L:

£61.12M

Total Revenue (TTM)

BME.L:

£11.35B

KOD.L:

£0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

BME.L:

£3.95B

KOD.L:

-£29.81K

EBITDA (TTM)

BME.L:

£1.54B

KOD.L:

£25.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BME.L vs. KOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BME.L
BME.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

KOD.L
KOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
KOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
KOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L) and Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BME.LKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.03

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

-0.27

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

-0.42

+0.12

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BME.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is comparable to the KOD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BME.L and KOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BME.L drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, smaller than the maximum KOD.L drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BME.L and KOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BME.LKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-99.05%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.72%

-48.21%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.38%

-64.89%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.38%

-72.37%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.38%

-95.13%

+24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.45%

-88.57%

+30.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.70%

-89.60%

+70.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.00%

30.81%

-2.81%

Volatility

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Volatility Comparison

B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L) at 9.61%. This indicates that BME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BME.LKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

9.61%

+5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.12%

47.13%

-14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.80%

73.37%

-26.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.98%

77.54%

-42.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.81%

107.71%

-76.90%

Dividends

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Dividend Comparison

BME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while KOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BME.L
B&M European Value Retail SA
4.61%15.84%8.69%6.19%4.01%9.35%8.18%1.86%2.66%1.49%
KOD.L
Kodal Minerals plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BME.L vs. KOD.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&M European Value Retail SA and Kodal Minerals plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.03B
0
(BME.L) Total Revenue
(KOD.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BME.L and KOD.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BME.L and KOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer