PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMDSX vs. BSBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMDSX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than BSBIX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BMDSX has outperformed BSBIX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while BSBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.


BMDSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.64%
YTD
6.15%
6M
3.83%
1Y
0.61%
3Y*
0.80%
5Y*
-0.90%
10Y*
8.66%

BSBIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.15%-9.55%-1.16%19.91%-27.86%21.81%34.56%35.94%-1.52%26.61%
BSBIX
Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.73%5.67%4.99%5.65%-3.64%-0.42%4.23%4.68%1.49%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BMDSX and BSBIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2004

-0.09

The correlation between BMDSX and BSBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMDSX vs. BSBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMDSX
BMDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BMDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BMDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BSBIX
BSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMDSXBSBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.82

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

4.28

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

18.62

-18.49

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the BSBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMDSX and BSBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMDSXBSBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

3.07

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.29

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

1.49

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.64

-1.31

Drawdowns

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMDSX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, which is greater than BSBIX's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMDSX and BSBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMDSXBSBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.96%

-5.95%

-48.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-0.94%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.04%

-0.94%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.24%

-5.95%

-30.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.24%

-5.95%

-30.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.02%

-0.13%

-20.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-0.55%

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.76%

0.22%

+6.54%

Volatility

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX) at 0.42%. This indicates that BMDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMDSXBSBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

0.42%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

0.98%

+10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

1.31%

+13.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

1.94%

+19.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

1.67%

+19.12%

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMDSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BSBIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMDSX vs. BSBIX - Dividend Comparison

BMDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.08%, more than BSBIX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.08%13.88%4.57%2.44%1.79%17.82%10.09%5.77%6.62%4.87%0.00%0.15%
BSBIX
Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.27%4.35%4.34%3.41%1.79%1.42%2.61%2.49%2.20%1.73%1.60%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMDSX and BSBIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMDSX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to BSBIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMDSX dropped -53.96% vs BSBIX's -5.95%.

BSBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMDSX and BSBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer