BMAX vs. SPF2.DE
BMAX (REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF) and SPF2.DE (SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Convertible Bonds funds. BMAX is actively managed, while SPF2.DE is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPF2.DE.
Performance
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BMAX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPF2.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 37.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMAX REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | 4.03% | -13.05% |
SPF2.DE SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 18.47% | 20.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAX and SPF2.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BMAX
SPF2.DE
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX) and SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPF2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAX | SPF2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.12 | — |
Drawdowns
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAX | SPF2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.10% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.68% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAX | SPF2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.16% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 10.14% | — |
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPF2.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAX vs. SPF2.DE - Dividend Comparison
BMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPF2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAX REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPF2.DE SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAX and SPF2.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPF2.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPF2.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for BMAX.
They also come from different issuers: REX and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for BMAX and 0.50% for SPF2.DE.
Find the right allocation for BMAX and SPF2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer