BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L
BMAX.TO (Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF) and MAGG.L (BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, BMAX.TO returned 19.44%/yr vs 21.63%/yr for MAGG.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMAX.TO charges 2.62%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MAGG.L.
Performance
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while MAGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MAGG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than MAGG.L's 15.51% return.
BMAX.TO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGG.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 11.68% | 17.88% | 19.43% | 11.56% | 5.83% |
MAGG.L BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 15.51% | 13.80% | 27.67% | 15.98% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAX.TO and MAGG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BMAX.TO and MAGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BMAX.TO
MAGG.L
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMAX.TO | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.09 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 11.54 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum MAGG.L drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and MAGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAX.TO | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -31.61% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.68% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -16.49% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.08% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -7.23% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.33% | -0.19% |
Volatility
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) is 4.09%, while BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that BMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAX.TO | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.55% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 11.15% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.15% | 13.81% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 16.57% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 16.50% | -3.33% |
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAX.TO vs. MAGG.L - Dividend Comparison
BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, while MAGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 9.38% | 9.70% | 9.65% | 9.55% | 2.41% |
MAGG.L BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAX.TO and MAGG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.25% for MAGG.L.
Find the right allocation for BMAX.TO and MAGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer