BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO
BMAX.TO (Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMAX.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Brompton Funds, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past 3 years, BMAX.TO returned 18.63%/yr vs 22.89%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMAX.TO charges 2.62%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.
Performance
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return.
BMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 29.01%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- 1Y
- 41.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 25.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 9.27% | 17.88% | 19.42% | 11.56% | 6.10% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 29.01% | 13.13% | 17.39% | 5.72% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Technology
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Healthcare
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Industrials
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Energy
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
Consumer Defensive
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Utilities
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Communication Services
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Basic Materials
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Real Estate
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMAX.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.53 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 4.93 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 17.54 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAX.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.98 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.00 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAX.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -89.91% | +74.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.48% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -16.67% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.99% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -39.82% | +37.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.38% | -0.25% |
Volatility
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that BMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAX.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 5.66% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 12.36% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 14.08% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 23.03% | -9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 29.05% | -15.92% |
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 9.59% | 9.70% | 9.64% | 9.55% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.09% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.09% | 8.35% | 6.92% | 4.77% | 15.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENCC.TO is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.
BMAX.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer