PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return.


BMAX.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.64%
YTD
9.27%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10Y*

ENCC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.37%
YTD
29.01%
6M
25.71%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
9.27%17.88%19.42%11.56%6.10%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
29.01%13.13%17.39%5.72%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022

0.26

The correlation between BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BMAX.TO
ENCC.TO

Financial Services

24.1%

-

Technology

18.8%

-

Healthcare

17.0%

-

Industrials

13.0%

-

Energy

7.0%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Utilities

4.4%

-

Communication Services

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

BMAX.TO
24.1%
ENCC.TO

-

Technology

BMAX.TO
18.8%
ENCC.TO

-

Healthcare

BMAX.TO
17.0%
ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

BMAX.TO
13.0%
ENCC.TO

-

Energy

BMAX.TO
7.0%
ENCC.TO
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

BMAX.TO
4.9%
ENCC.TO

-

Utilities

BMAX.TO
4.4%
ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

BMAX.TO
4.3%
ENCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

BMAX.TO
2.6%
ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

BMAX.TO
2.6%
ENCC.TO

-

Real Estate

BMAX.TO
1.3%
ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAX.TO
BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMAX.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.53

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.93

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

17.54

-7.08

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAX.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.98

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.00

+1.38

Drawdowns

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAX.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-89.91%

+74.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-8.48%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-16.67%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.99%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-39.82%

+37.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.38%

-0.25%

Volatility

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that BMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMAX.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

5.66%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

12.36%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

14.08%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

23.03%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.13%

29.05%

-15.92%

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
9.59%9.70%9.64%9.55%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.09%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENCC.TO is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.

BMAX.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAX.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer