BLV vs. SCHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ).
BLV and SCHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. Both BLV and SCHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BLV vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLV vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -0.30% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | -0.59% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.10% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's -0.10% return.
BLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 1.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -4.82%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLV vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BLV and SCHQ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BLV vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
BLV
SCHQ
BLV vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | -0.03 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 0.03 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.04 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 0.10 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | -0.03 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.33 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.25 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLV and SCHQ is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BLV vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, which matches SCHQ's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.73% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BLV vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and SCHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -46.13% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -8.46% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -40.93% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.58% | -36.61% | +12.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -26.08% | +16.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.88% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BLV vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 3.46% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 5.99% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 10.36% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 14.55% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 15.48% | -3.49% |