BLV vs. SCHQ
BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLV returned -3.65%/yr vs -5.55%/yr for SCHQ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
BLV vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's 0.57% return.
BLV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 0.93%
SCHQ
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BLV vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 1.00% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | -1.67% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.57% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLV and SCHQ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BLV and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLV vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
BLV
SCHQ
BLV vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.59 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 1.46 | +0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLV vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -46.13% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | -7.01% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -17.65% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -40.93% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.60% | -36.18% | +12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -26.43% | +16.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.84% | -0.50% |
Volatility
BLV vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) is 1.96%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that BLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLV | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.07% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 6.07% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.97% | 8.65% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 14.49% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 15.29% | -3.30% |
BLV vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BLV and SCHQ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLV vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, which matches SCHQ's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.77% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.74% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BLV and SCHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to BLV (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLV dropped -38.29% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 5-year performance, BLV leads with -3.65% vs -5.55% for SCHQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, BLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLV has performed better with a -3.65% return vs -5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLV and SCHQ have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.74% for SCHQ.
BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while SCHQ is Government Bonds. BLV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
BLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLV and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer