BLV vs. FIYY
BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while FIYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. BLV is passively managed, while FIYY is actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLV charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
BLV vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- -0.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.08%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- 0.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.05%
FIYY
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.99M | $52.76M | $45.16M | |
| $561.45 | $568.29 | $1.17K |
BLV vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -1.59% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLV and FIYY is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLV vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
BLV
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLV vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLV | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLV vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLV | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -2.94% | -35.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.16% | -1.60% | -24.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -1.59% | -8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BLV vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLV | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.77% | 5.71% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 5.71% | +7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 5.71% | +6.24% |
BLV vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLV vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than FIYY's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.97% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLV and FIYY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.24% for FIYY.
BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while FIYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BLV and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for BLV and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer