BLUI vs. NBFC
BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) and NBFC (Flexible Credit Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLUI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for NBFC.
Performance
BLUI vs. NBFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than NBFC's 1.47% return.
BLUI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBFC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUI vs. NBFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 3.69% | 3.80% |
NBFC Flexible Credit Income ETF | 1.47% | 5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUI and NBFC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUI vs. NBFC — Risk / Return Rank
BLUI
NBFC
BLUI vs. NBFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Flexible Credit Income ETF (NBFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUI | NBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.07 | 2.25 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
BLUI vs. NBFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, smaller than the maximum NBFC drawdown of -3.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and NBFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUI | NBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -3.99% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.10% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.44% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility
BLUI vs. NBFC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUI | NBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 3.21% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 3.63% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 3.63% | +0.27% |
BLUI vs. NBFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NBFC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLUI vs. NBFC - Dividend Comparison
BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than NBFC's 7.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 4.70% | 2.91% | 0.00% |
NBFC Flexible Credit Income ETF | 7.32% | 7.71% | 3.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUI and NBFC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBFC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBFC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.
NBFC has the higher dividend yield at 7.32%, compared with 4.70% for BLUI.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Neuberger. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.40% for NBFC.
Find the right allocation for BLUI and NBFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer