BLUEX vs. PCLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX).
BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991. PCLCX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -9.67% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | -12.90% | 9.86% | 28.05% | 35.17% | -28.18% | 20.18% | 39.70% | 31.99% | -3.18% | 29.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly higher than PCLCX's -12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BLUEX has underperformed PCLCX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while PCLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
BLUEX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- -8.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
PCLCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- -12.90%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLCX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BLUEX vs. PCLCX — Risk / Return Rank
BLUEX
PCLCX
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLUEX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 0.16 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | 0.37 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.05 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.14 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.67 | -0.41 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUEX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 0.16 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.20 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.42 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.35 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUEX and PCLCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Dividend Comparison
BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PCLCX's 23.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 23.71% | 20.66% | 11.94% | 2.09% | 60.17% | 22.81% | 18.38% | 16.53% | 22.05% | 10.32% | 3.30% | 17.60% |
Drawdowns
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, smaller than the maximum PCLCX drawdown of -63.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and PCLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUEX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.27% | -63.98% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -17.06% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -38.81% | +16.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.06% | -38.81% | +9.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.55% | -17.06% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -20.42% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 5.84% | -2.36% |
Volatility
BLUEX vs. PCLCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) is 3.41%, while PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that BLUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLUEX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 4.64% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | 10.72% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 19.41% | -8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 36.94% | -26.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 30.96% | -14.39% |