BLUEX vs. AQLGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX).

BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991. AQLGX is managed by Alta Capital. It was launched on Dec 19, 2018.

Performance

BLUEX vs. AQLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLUEX vs. AQLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-9.67%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	3.36%
AQLGX Alta Quality Growth Fund	0.00%	8.35%	13.01%	30.70%	-29.35%	20.05%	20.21%	34.04%	2.12%

Returns By Period

BLUEX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -7.41%
• YTD: -9.67%
• 6M: -9.53%
• 1Y: -8.25%
• 3Y*: 2.35%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

AQLGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUEX vs. AQLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AQLGX's 1.18% expense ratio.

AQLGX

Alta Quality Growth Fund

BLUEX

AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund

Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. AQLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 0
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUEX vs. AQLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLUEX	AQLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.07	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.67	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLUEX	AQLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and AQLGX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BLUEX vs. AQLGX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than AQLGX's 85.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.34%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
AQLGX Alta Quality Growth Fund	85.67%	85.67%	9.23%	0.11%	6.55%	1.90%	0.05%	2.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUEX	AQLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.55%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.39%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLUEX	AQLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.98%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	—	—