PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLTD vs. ZROZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLTD achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's 1.19% return.


BLTD

1D
0.18%
1M
1.46%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZROZ

1D
0.22%
1M
4.56%
YTD
1.19%
6M
0.40%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
-7.49%
5Y*
-11.95%
10Y*
-4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLTD and ZROZ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.93

The correlation between BLTD and ZROZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLTD vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLTD
BLTD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ZROZ
ZROZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ZROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLTDZROZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.04

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.23

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

0.50

+1.98

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLTD Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the ZROZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLTD and ZROZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLTD drawdown since its inception was -4.80%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLTD and ZROZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLTDZROZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-62.93%

+58.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.80%

-14.02%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-59.02%

+57.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-24.15%

+22.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

6.40%

-4.46%

Volatility

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) is 1.70%, while PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that BLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLTDZROZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

3.56%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.04%

10.75%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

15.73%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

23.83%

-17.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.82%

22.03%

-15.21%

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLTD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLTD vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison

BLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than ZROZ's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLTD
Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF
3.91%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
5.03%4.96%4.58%3.52%2.76%1.60%1.68%2.22%2.06%2.53%3.00%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BLTD and ZROZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ZROZ has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to BLTD (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLTD dropped -4.80% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.

On 1-year performance, BLTD leads with 4.79% vs 3.19% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BLTD has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLTD has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLTD.

ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 3.91% for BLTD.

BLTD is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while ZROZ is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLTD and 0.15% for ZROZ.

BLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLTD and ZROZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer