BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L
BLOK.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from First Trust and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK.L achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
BLOK.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 31.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 12.48% | 22.34% | 18.56% | 14.77% | -8.98% | 19.08% | 15.05% | 22.59% | -2.24% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK.L and XSTC.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between BLOK.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Technology
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Utilities
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
-
Healthcare
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
Real Estate
BLOK.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK.L
XSTC.L
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLOK.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 3.04 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.63 | 7.79 | +7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLOK.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.70 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.14 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK.L drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -29.30% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -17.49% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -29.30% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.43% | -29.30% | +12.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.71% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -6.30% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 6.83% | -4.79% |
Volatility
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) is 4.12%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that BLOK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.05% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 14.45% | -5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 19.63% | -7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 22.22% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 22.43% | -6.29% |
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
BLOK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BLOK.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BLOK.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for BLOK.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer