BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L
BLOK.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - BLOK.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while FOGB.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK.L returned 12.15%/yr vs -8.73%/yr for FOGB.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.
Performance
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.
BLOK.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 9.33% | 22.34% | 18.56% | 14.77% | -8.98% | 19.08% | 10.85% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 3.33% | -9.49% | -5.72% | -6.98% | -18.26% | 2.56% | 9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK.L and FOGB.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BLOK.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK.L
FOGB.L
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.98 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | -0.25 | +3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | -0.41 | +10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -43.46% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -12.73% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -23.44% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.06% | -43.46% | +23.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -38.99% | +35.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -24.51% | +15.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 7.79% | -5.49% |
Volatility
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) is 3.50%, while Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that BLOK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 4.25% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 11.01% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 15.10% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 15.83% | +3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 15.43% | +6.52% |
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLOK.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BLOK.L.
BLOK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BLOK.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for BLOK.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer