BLKC vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLKC is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. BLKC is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLKC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BLKC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLKC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -4.50%
• 1M: -25.15%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: 28.56%
• 1Y: 88.29%
• 3Y*: 46.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$31.33M	$35.26M	$40.65M

BLKC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF	0.34%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	26.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BLKC and WGMI is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026	0.05

Return for Risk

BLKC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLKC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 45
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 45
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLKC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLKC	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.40	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLKC	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-85.76%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-31.76%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-42.00%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLKC	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	25.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	79.42%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	81.63%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	81.63%	—

BLKC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLKC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLKC nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLKC and WGMI in my portfolio?

BLKC and WGMI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLKC or WGMI?

On fees, BLKC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLKC or WGMI?

BLKC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLKC or WGMI?

BLKC and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BLKC and WGMI?

BLKC is categorized as Blockchain, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.75% for WGMI.