BLCR vs. DYNF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLCR returned 48.53% vs 30.19% for DYNF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLCR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.

Performance

BLCR vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCR achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's 11.55% return.

BLCR

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 6M: 21.52%
• 1Y: 48.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DYNF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: 26.22%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCR vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.96%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	11.55%	20.00%	30.29%	18.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCR and DYNF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.91

The correlation between BLCR and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLCR vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCR	DYNF
Technology	35.7%	39.8%
Industrials	13.5%	8.4%
Financial Services	12.1%	16.2%
Communication Services	11.0%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	7.8%
Healthcare	7.6%	6.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.7%
Energy	2.2%	1.9%
Utilities	1.6%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Real Estate	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

BLCR vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 89
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 73
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCR vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLCR	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.44	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	3.32	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.43	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	3.50	+1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.10	16.97	+6.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLCR vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCR Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCR and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLCR	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.44	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.91	0.83	+1.08

Drawdowns

BLCR vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCR drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCR and DYNF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCR	DYNF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-34.72%	+13.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-8.67%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.57%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-5.98%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.78%	+0.38%

Volatility

BLCR vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 3.27%. This indicates that BLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCR	DYNF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	3.27%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	9.55%	+2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	12.44%	+3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	17.50%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	19.90%	-2.42%

BLCR vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCR vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than DYNF's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	0.89%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCR and DYNF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BLCR and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLCR or DYNF?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to DYNF (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCR dropped -21.29% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

Which ETF is better, BLCR or DYNF?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 48.53% vs 30.19% for DYNF. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCR or DYNF?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 48.53% return vs 30.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCR or DYNF?

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCR or DYNF?

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between BLCR and DYNF?

BLCR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for BLCR and 0.30% for DYNF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.