PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BL vs. MQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BL vs. MQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackLine, Inc. (BL) and Marqeta, Inc. (MQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BL achieves a -48.04% return, which is significantly lower than MQ's -19.37% return.


BL

1D
2.86%
1M
13.87%
YTD
-48.04%
6M
-51.03%
1Y
-48.48%
3Y*
-19.03%
5Y*
-22.99%
10Y*

MQ

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-22.47%
1Y
-30.49%
3Y*
-8.87%
5Y*
-34.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BL vs. MQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BL
BlackLine, Inc.
-48.04%-9.00%-2.69%-7.18%-35.03%0.53%
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.
-19.37%25.33%-45.70%14.24%-64.41%-47.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BL and MQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.48

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BL:

$2.01B

MQ:

$1.66B

EPS

BL:

$0.39

MQ:

$0.00

PE Ratio

BL:

72.90

MQ:

797.24

PS Ratio

BL:

2.70

MQ:

2.65

PB Ratio

BL:

6.56

MQ:

2.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

BL:

$716.65M

MQ:

$651.61M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BL:

$539.92M

MQ:

$456.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

BL:

$87.84M

MQ:

$24.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BL vs. MQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BL
BL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MQ
MQ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BL vs. MQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackLine, Inc. (BL) and Marqeta, Inc. (MQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLMQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.89

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.69

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.81

-1.00

-0.82

BL vs. MQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BL Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the MQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BL and MQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BL vs. MQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BL drawdown since its inception was -83.22%, smaller than the maximum MQ drawdown of -89.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BL and MQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.22%

-89.71%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.11%

-44.66%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.25%

-53.34%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.80%

-89.71%

+8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.89%

-88.48%

+7.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-75.26%

+40.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.79%

30.68%

-3.89%

Volatility

BL vs. MQ - Volatility Comparison

BlackLine, Inc. (BL) has a higher volatility of 19.95% compared to Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) at 15.42%. This indicates that BL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.95%

15.42%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.65%

29.25%

+12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.61%

42.58%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.70%

64.79%

-20.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.85%

64.82%

-19.97%

Dividends

BL vs. MQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BL nor MQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BL vs. MQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackLine, Inc. and Marqeta, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
183.16M
165.80M
(BL) Total Revenue
(MQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BL vs. MQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BlackLine, Inc. and Marqeta, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.0%
70.9%
Portfolio components
BL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackLine, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.15M and revenue of 183.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.0%.

MQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.59M and revenue of 165.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

BL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackLine, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.24M and revenue of 183.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

MQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

BL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackLine, Inc. reported a net income of 8.13M and revenue of 183.16M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

MQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BL and MQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BL has higher volatility (19.95%) compared to MQ (15.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BL dropped -83.22% vs MQ's -89.71%.

MQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BL and MQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer