PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKUI vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKUI vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BKUI having a 1.42% return and MMKT slightly higher at 1.44%.


BKUI

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKUI vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
1.42%4.93%1.07%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
1.44%4.13%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BKUI and MMKT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKUI vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKUI
BKUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BKUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKUI Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BKUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKUI vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKUIMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-37.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

6.02

15.14

-9.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

32.56

153.44

-120.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

230.94

910.67

-679.73

BKUI vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKUI Sharpe Ratio is 10.52, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKUI and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKUIMMKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52

16.49

-5.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.08

17.60

-11.52

Drawdowns

BKUI vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKUI drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKUI and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKUIMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-0.04%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-0.02%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-0.00%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.00%

+0.02%

Volatility

BKUI vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) has a higher volatility of 0.15% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that BKUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKUIMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

0.05%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

0.13%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

0.23%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.59%

0.23%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.59%

0.23%

+0.36%

BKUI vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKUI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKUI vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

BKUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than MMKT's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
4.21%4.48%5.11%4.29%1.82%0.22%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.73%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKUI and MMKT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKUI has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKUI dropped -1.72% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, BKUI leads with 4.32% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BKUI has performed better with a 4.32% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.

BKUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.

BKUI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for BKUI and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 10.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKUI and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer