PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKT.MC vs. TM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKT.MC vs. TM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Bankinter (BKT.MC) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BKT.MC is traded in EUR, while TM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKT.MC achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -15.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BKT.MC has outperformed TM with an annualized return of 17.53%, while TM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


BKT.MC

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.78%
6M
4.47%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
45.37%
5Y*
32.74%
10Y*
17.53%

TM

1D
-0.51%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
-15.61%
6M
-8.93%
1Y
-3.15%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKT.MC vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKT.MC
Bankinter
0.78%94.34%41.39%0.19%45.87%48.27%-29.48%-0.79%-6.63%12.24%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-15.61%0.31%16.07%34.08%-19.75%32.42%4.26%25.47%-1.39%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BKT.MC and TM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKT.MC vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKT.MC
BKT.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BKT.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKT.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKT.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BKT.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKT.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKT.MC vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bankinter (BKT.MC) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKT.MCTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.01

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

-0.12

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

-0.31

+7.39

BKT.MC vs. TM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the TM Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT.MC and TM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKT.MCTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.11

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.12

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.34

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.24

+0.20

Drawdowns

BKT.MC vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT.MC drawdown since its inception was -79.72%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -47.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT.MC and TM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKT.MCTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.72%

-47.63%

-32.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-26.49%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-36.44%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.89%

-36.44%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.55%

-36.44%

-27.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-30.81%

+24.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-17.03%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

10.22%

-5.72%

Volatility

BKT.MC vs. TM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bankinter (BKT.MC) is 6.01%, while Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that BKT.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKT.MCTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

7.46%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

20.00%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.48%

28.74%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.74%

26.30%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.48%

23.62%

+6.86%

Dividends

BKT.MC vs. TM - Dividend Comparison

BKT.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than TM's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKT.MC
Bankinter
4.30%4.06%6.73%7.79%4.48%5.20%3.05%6.21%5.67%4.37%3.96%4.85%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.62%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

BKT.MC vs. TM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bankinter and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BKT.MC values in EUR, TM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BKT.MC and TM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKT.MC and TM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer