BKSE vs. BKDV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BKSE (BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF) and BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKSE is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while BKDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKSE is passively managed, while BKDV is actively managed. Over the past year, BKSE returned 37.25% vs 31.37% for BKDV. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BKSE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BKDV.

Performance

BKSE vs. BKDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKSE achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than BKDV's 18.37% return.

BKSE

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 1Y: 37.25%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.75%

BKDV

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.93%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 18.37%
• 1Y: 31.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	$13.25M	$13.47M	$12.30M
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF	$343.03K	$235.90K	$242.30K

BKSE vs. BKDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF	20.27%	13.09%	1.52%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	18.37%	18.58%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BKSE and BKDV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	0.85

The correlation between BKSE and BKDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKSE vs. BKDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKSE	BKDV
Financial Services	16.4%	21.9%
Technology	16.0%	16.0%
Industrials	14.9%	11.8%
Healthcare	14.2%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	9.9%
Real Estate	7.2%	1.1%
Energy	5.9%	7.0%
Basic Materials	4.3%	3.4%
Utilities	3.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	7.5%
Communication Services	2.0%	5.7%

Return for Risk

BKSE vs. BKDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKSE

BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 87
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 93
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKSE vs. BKDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKSE	BKDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.59	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.61	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.46	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	4.74	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	18.11	-3.82

BKSE vs. BKDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the BKDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKSE and BKDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKSE vs. BKDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKSE drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, which is greater than BKDV's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKSE and BKDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKSE	BKDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.08%	-15.49%	-13.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-6.65%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-2.23%	-6.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.74%	+0.87%

Volatility

BKSE vs. BKDV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) at 3.04%. This indicates that BKSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKSE	BKDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.04%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	9.33%	+2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	12.17%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	15.39%	+5.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.13%	15.39%	+6.74%

BKSE vs. BKDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKSE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKSE vs. BKDV - Dividend Comparison

BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than BKDV's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.52%	0.62%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF	1.19%	1.26%	1.55%	1.38%	1.50%	1.17%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKSE and BKDV in my portfolio?

BKSE and BKDV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKSE or BKDV?

BKSE has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to BKDV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKSE dropped -29.08% vs BKDV's -15.49%.

Which ETF is better, BKSE or BKDV?

On 1-year performance, BKSE leads with 37.25% vs 31.37% for BKDV. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKSE or BKDV?

Over the 1-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 37.25% return vs 31.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKSE or BKDV?

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BKDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKSE or BKDV?

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.52% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BKSE and BKDV?

BKSE is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BKDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKSE and 0.60% for BKDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.