BKIPX vs. LIFAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKIPX (iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K) and LIFAX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. BKIPX is passively managed, while LIFAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKIPX returned 2.87%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for LIFAX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKIPX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LIFAX.

Performance

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKIPX having a 2.00% return and LIFAX slightly lower at 1.95%.

BKIPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: 5.04%
• 5Y*: 2.87%
• 10Y*: —

LIFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: 3.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K	2.00%	6.08%	4.77%	3.37%	-4.18%	5.21%	4.86%	4.90%	0.61%	0.90%
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A	1.95%	7.03%	4.53%	3.76%	-5.57%	10.29%	5.94%	4.87%	-1.27%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIPX and LIFAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.59

Over the past year, BKIPX and LIFAX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BKIPX vs. LIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIPX

BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

LIFAX

LIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 82
LIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKIPX	LIFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.37	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	4.27	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.51	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	4.55	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.09	19.03	-2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the LIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIPX and LIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKIPX	LIFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.37	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.75	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.46	+0.67

Drawdowns

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIPX drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, smaller than the maximum LIFAX drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIPX and LIFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKIPX	LIFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-18.15%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.32%	-1.18%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.32%	-2.03%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.42%	-8.56%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.07%	-3.51%	+2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	0.28%	+0.01%

Volatility

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) at 0.66%. This indicates that BKIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKIPX	LIFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	0.66%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	1.62%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	2.27%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.12%	4.00%	-0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.64%	4.54%	-1.90%

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIPX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LIFAX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKIPX vs. LIFAX - Dividend Comparison

BKIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than LIFAX's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K	4.63%	4.68%	4.33%	2.77%	4.80%	4.41%	1.17%	2.54%	2.56%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A	4.71%	4.74%	4.00%	3.69%	2.60%	2.35%	3.59%	3.95%	3.95%	3.76%	4.32%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKIPX and LIFAX in my portfolio?

BKIPX and LIFAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKIPX or LIFAX?

BKIPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to LIFAX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIPX dropped -6.42% vs LIFAX's -18.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.