BKIPX vs. FSTZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKIPX (iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K) and FSTZX (Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BKIPX returned 5.04%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for FSTZX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKIPX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FSTZX.

Performance

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BKIPX having a 2.00% return and FSTZX slightly higher at 2.09%.

BKIPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: 5.04%
• 5Y*: 2.87%
• 10Y*: —

FSTZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K	2.00%	6.08%	4.77%	3.37%	-4.18%	1.69%
FSTZX Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund	2.09%	5.99%	4.87%	4.67%	-2.83%	1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIPX and FSTZX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021	0.82

The correlation between BKIPX and FSTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BKIPX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIPX

BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FSTZX

FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKIPX	FSTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.86	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	4.65	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.65	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	6.68	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.09	24.52	-8.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIPX and FSTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKIPX	FSTZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.86	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	1.20	-0.06

Drawdowns

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIPX drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIPX and FSTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKIPX	FSTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-5.30%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.32%	-0.70%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.32%	-1.03%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.07%	-1.09%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	0.19%	+0.10%

Volatility

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) at 0.51%. This indicates that BKIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKIPX	FSTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	0.51%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	1.09%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	1.64%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.12%	2.79%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.64%	2.79%	-0.15%

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIPX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKIPX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

BKIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FSTZX's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K	4.63%	4.68%	4.33%	2.77%	4.80%	4.41%	1.17%	2.54%	2.56%	1.90%
FSTZX Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund	3.64%	4.02%	2.78%	2.54%	5.25%	0.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKIPX and FSTZX in my portfolio?

BKIPX and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKIPX or FSTZX?

BKIPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FSTZX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIPX dropped -6.42% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.