BKGI vs. PBOG
BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. BKGI is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKGI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
BKGI vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.
BKGI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 12.20% | 1.11% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKGI and PBOG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKGI vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
BKGI
PBOG
BKGI vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKGI | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKGI | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 3.31 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
BKGI vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKGI | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -11.45% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -6.81% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -3.10% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BKGI vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKGI | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 23.67% | -12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 23.67% | -9.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 23.67% | -9.60% |
BKGI vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKGI vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.69% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKGI and PBOG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for BKGI and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer