PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKF vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKF vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BKF has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 4.94%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


BKF

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
4.94%

NFTY

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-8.94%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
-7.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
-7.90%22.30%9.24%1.27%-21.78%-11.87%16.52%22.93%-13.80%41.80%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-8.94%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and NFTY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012

0.40

The correlation between BKF and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKF vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKF
NFTY

Financial Services

23.7%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
16.3%

Communication Services

12.6%
2.0%

Technology

7.9%
9.2%

Basic Materials

7.3%
12.5%

Energy

7.2%
8.5%

Industrials

7.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.2%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
8.3%

Utilities

3.9%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

BKF
23.7%
NFTY
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BKF
19.5%
NFTY
16.3%

Communication Services

BKF
12.6%
NFTY
2.0%

Technology

BKF
7.9%
NFTY
9.2%

Basic Materials

BKF
7.3%
NFTY
12.5%

Energy

BKF
7.2%
NFTY
8.5%

Industrials

BKF
7.2%
NFTY
8.3%

Healthcare

BKF
5.2%
NFTY
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

BKF
4.2%
NFTY
8.3%

Utilities

BKF
3.9%
NFTY
4.0%

Real Estate

BKF
1.3%
NFTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKF vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF
BKF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKFNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.93

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

-0.46

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

-1.20

+1.39

BKF vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

-0.50

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.28

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.40

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.28

-0.28

Drawdowns

BKF vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.29%

-47.67%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-16.14%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-21.55%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.94%

-21.55%

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.20%

-47.67%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.41%

-16.76%

-8.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-9.58%

-18.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

6.16%

-1.00%

Volatility

BKF vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.59%. This indicates that BKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

4.59%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

12.58%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

14.73%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

17.38%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

20.71%

+1.06%

BKF vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKF vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, which matches NFTY's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
1.95%1.79%2.37%1.68%2.04%2.93%1.02%1.66%2.33%1.51%1.82%3.15%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.94%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKF and NFTY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKF has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to NFTY (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.17% vs 4.94% for BKF. On fees, BKF is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKF is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

BKF and NFTY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.95%.

BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.80% for NFTY.

BKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKF and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer