BKF vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKF (iShares MSCI BRIC ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BKF tracks the MSCI BRIC Index while FLTW tracks the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKF returned -4.04%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for FLTW. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKF charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

BKF vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 71.40% return.

BKF

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: -7.90%
• 6M: -8.83%
• 1Y: 0.96%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: -4.04%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

FLTW

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 16.51%
• YTD: 71.40%
• 6M: 77.35%
• 1Y: 117.33%
• 3Y*: 42.83%
• 5Y*: 21.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF	-7.90%	22.30%	9.24%	1.27%	-21.78%	-11.87%	16.52%	22.93%	-13.80%	0.33%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	71.40%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	29.46%	29.77%	31.23%	-9.32%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and FLTW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.58

The correlation between BKF and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKF vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKF	FLTW
Financial Services	23.7%	12.6%
Consumer Cyclical	19.5%	1.7%
Communication Services	12.6%	1.6%
Technology	7.9%	75.6%
Basic Materials	7.3%	2.9%
Energy	7.2%	0.1%
Industrials	7.2%	4.0%
Healthcare	5.2%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	0.9%
Utilities	3.9%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

BKF vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF

BKF Risk / Return Rank: 10
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKF	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	4.54	-4.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	5.05	-4.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.70	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	10.85	-10.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	34.18	-33.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKF vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKF	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	4.54	-4.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.97	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.95	-0.94

Drawdowns

BKF vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKF	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.29%	-38.00%	-32.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-10.87%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.60%	-26.45%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.94%	-38.00%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.41%	-1.18%	-24.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.11%	-8.43%	-19.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.16%	3.45%	+1.71%

Volatility

BKF vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) is 5.44%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that BKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKF	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	11.76%	-6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	21.34%	-8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	26.03%	-10.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.51%	22.44%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	21.77%	0.00%

BKF vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKF vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than FLTW's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF	1.95%	1.79%	2.37%	1.68%	2.04%	2.93%	1.02%	1.66%	2.33%	1.51%	1.82%	3.15%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.46%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKF and FLTW in my portfolio?

BKF and FLTW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKF or FLTW?

FLTW has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to BKF (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which ETF is better, BKF or FLTW?

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 21.59% vs -4.04% for BKF. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BKF has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKF or FLTW?

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 21.59% return vs -4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKF or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BKF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKF or FLTW?

BKF has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.46% for FLTW.

What is the main difference between BKF and FLTW?

BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.19% for FLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.