BKDV vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). BKDV is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, BKDV returned 25.90% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. BKDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

BKDV vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

BKDV

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 12.46%
• YTD: 16.30%
• 1Y: 25.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKDV vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	16.30%	18.58%	-0.91%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-54.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and SBIT is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	-0.32

Return for Risk

BKDV vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 85
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKDV	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.41	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.05	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.25	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	2.60	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.26	5.92	+8.34

BKDV vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKDV	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-91.35%	+75.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-47.94%	+41.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-77.15%	+77.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-68.83%	+66.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	21.04%	-19.22%

Volatility

BKDV vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is 3.20%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that BKDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKDV	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	22.98%	-19.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.35%	68.89%	-59.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	88.51%	-76.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	96.89%	-81.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	96.89%	-81.37%

BKDV vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKDV vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.53%	0.62%	0.27%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKDV and SBIT in my portfolio?

BKDV and SBIT have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKDV or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to BKDV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKDV dropped -15.49% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, BKDV or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 25.90% for BKDV. On fees, BKDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BKDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKDV or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 25.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKDV or SBIT?

BKDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKDV or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.53% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BKDV and SBIT?

BKDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BKDV and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.