BKDV vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BKDV returned 30.25% vs 10.65% for DIVZ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.

Performance

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.37% return.

BKDV

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 6M: 16.73%
• 1Y: 30.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVZ

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 10.65%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	13.89%	18.58%	-0.91%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	3.37%	16.72%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and DIVZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2024	0.70

The correlation between BKDV and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKDV	DIVZ
Financial Services	23.6%	8.7%
Industrials	15.4%	4.6%
Healthcare	14.4%	16.0%
Technology	13.5%	8.0%
Energy	8.3%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	6.6%
Communication Services	7.1%	5.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	20.0%
Utilities	1.4%	17.2%
Real Estate	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

BKDV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 80
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKDV	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	1.15	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	1.71	+1.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.20	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	1.93	+2.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.01	4.83	+12.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKDV	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	1.15	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.89	+0.42

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, roughly equal to the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKDV	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-15.42%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-5.83%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.25%	+4.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-3.49%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.33%	-0.52%

Volatility

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKDV	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	3.49%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	7.06%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	9.29%	+2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	12.65%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	12.57%	+3.12%

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKDV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DIVZ's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.54%	0.62%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.59%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKDV and DIVZ in my portfolio?

BKDV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKDV or DIVZ?

BKDV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to DIVZ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKDV dropped -15.49% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, BKDV or DIVZ?

On 1-year performance, BKDV leads with 30.25% vs 10.65% for DIVZ. On fees, BKDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKDV or DIVZ?

Over the 1-year period, BKDV has performed better with a 30.25% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKDV or DIVZ?

BKDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKDV or DIVZ?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.54% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BKDV and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BKDV and 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.