BKDV vs. BKGI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BKDV returned 28.39% vs 20.53% for BKGI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

BKDV vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 12.30% return.

BKDV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 14.68%
• 6M: 13.66%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKDV vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	14.68%	18.58%	-0.91%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	12.30%	37.53%	-2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and BKGI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	0.46

BKDV vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKDV	BKGI
Financial Services	21.7%	-
Technology	15.8%	-
Healthcare	14.5%	-
Industrials	12.5%	11.8%
Energy	7.8%	20.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	-
Communication Services	6.9%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	-
Utilities	1.5%	46.8%
Real Estate	1.2%	18.1%

Return for Risk

BKDV vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 81
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 59
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKDV	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.78	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.47	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.32	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	3.35	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.58	10.49	+5.09

BKDV vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BKGI drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKDV	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-14.79%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-6.16%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-3.05%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-2.56%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.96%	-0.13%

Volatility

BKDV vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 3.29%. This indicates that BKDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKDV	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	3.29%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	9.27%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	11.64%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.71%	14.02%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	14.02%	+1.69%

BKDV vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKDV vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BKGI's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.54%	0.62%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.69%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKDV and BKGI in my portfolio?

BKDV and BKGI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKDV or BKGI?

BKDV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to BKGI (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKDV dropped -15.49% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

Which ETF is better, BKDV or BKGI?

On 1-year performance, BKDV leads with 28.39% vs 20.53% for BKGI. On fees, BKDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKDV or BKGI?

Over the 1-year period, BKDV has performed better with a 28.39% return vs 20.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKDV or BKGI?

BKDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKDV or BKGI?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.54% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BKDV and BKGI?

BKDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BKGI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BKDV and 0.65% for BKGI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.