BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO
BKCN.L (WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKCN.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLX.TO.
Performance
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BKCN.L is traded in GBp, while SOLX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOLX.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCN.L achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly higher than SOLX.TO's -46.66% return.
BKCN.L
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 45.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLX.TO
- 1D
- -10.59%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- -46.66%
- 6M
- -53.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKCN.L WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.17% | -4.92% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | -46.66% | -40.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCN.L and SOLX.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BKCN.L
SOLX.TO
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCN.L) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCN.L | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCN.L | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -1.06 | +1.36 |
Drawdowns
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum SOLX.TO drawdown of -73.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCN.L and SOLX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCN.L | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.26% | -73.48% | +20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.13% | -73.48% | +36.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.11% | -47.50% | +20.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.84% | — | — |
Volatility
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCN.L | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.54% | 73.71% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.11% | 73.71% | -7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.11% | 73.71% | -7.60% |
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCN.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLX.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCN.L vs. SOLX.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKCN.L nor SOLX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BKCN.L WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.90% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCN.L and SOLX.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKCN.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCN.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BKCN.L and 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
Find the right allocation for BKCN.L and SOLX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer