PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCN.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BKCN.L is traded in GBp, while SLVR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCN.L achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.L's 4.04% return.


BKCN.L

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.57%
YTD
14.17%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
45.58%
5Y*
10Y*

SLVR.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.90%
YTD
4.04%
6M
27.59%
1Y
111.39%
3Y*
39.80%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BKCN.L
WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
14.17%9.09%32.16%142.21%-50.98%
SLVR.L
WisdomTree Silver
4.04%119.85%22.25%-7.44%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCN.L and SLVR.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCN.L
BKCN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BKCN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR.L
SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCN.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCN.LSLVR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.34

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.86

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

6.24

-5.33

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCN.L and SLVR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCN.LSLVR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.93

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.29

0.00

Drawdowns

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum SLVR.L drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCN.L and SLVR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCN.LSLVR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.26%

-72.07%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.69%

-38.77%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.69%

-38.77%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.13%

-33.71%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.11%

-43.50%

+16.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.84%

17.80%

+15.04%

Volatility

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCN.L) is 11.76%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that BKCN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCN.LSLVR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

17.02%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.65%

54.71%

-24.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.54%

57.51%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.11%

35.17%

+30.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

31.09%

+35.02%

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCN.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCN.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKCN.L nor SLVR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BKCN.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BKCN.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKCN.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SLVR.L.

BKCN.L is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SLVR.L is Silver. BKCN.L tracks WisdomTree Blockchain UCITS Index, while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BKCN.L and 0.49% for SLVR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCN.L and SLVR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer