BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BKCL.TO (Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF) and HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCL.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. BKCL.TO is actively managed, while HXQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCL.TO returned 28.08%/yr vs 24.20%/yr for HXQ.TO. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BKCL.TO charges 1.68%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.

Performance

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCL.TO achieves a 29.34% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 14.56% return.

BKCL.TO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 30.36%
• YTD: 29.34%
• 1Y: 60.97%
• 3Y*: 28.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.33%

HXQ.TO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -5.98%
• 6M: 14.12%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 24.20%
• 5Y*: 16.73%
• 10Y*: 21.14%
• ALL TIME*: 21.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKCL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	CA$565.10K	CA$456.31K	CA$444.75K
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF	CA$2.97M	CA$3.02M	CA$3.91M

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BKCL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	29.34%	34.78%	20.06%	5.22%
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF	14.56%	15.05%	35.98%	10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2023	0.37

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKCL.TO	HXQ.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	3.1%
Real Estate	-	0.2%
Technology	-	55.9%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCL.TO

BKCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
BKCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BKCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BKCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BKCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BKCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

HXQ.TO

HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 51
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCL.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.28	1.25	+3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.42	1.75	+3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.23	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.61	1.90	+4.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.21	5.49	+23.72

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.58%, smaller than the maximum HXQ.TO drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCL.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.58%	-31.60%	+15.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-12.43%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.94%	-22.58%	+7.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-7.80%	+5.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-5.72%	+3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	4.30%	-2.23%

Volatility

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO) is 6.31%, while Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that BKCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCL.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	6.71%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	15.67%	-3.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	18.98%	-4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.38%	21.29%	-7.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.38%	21.07%	-7.69%

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCL.TO has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

BKCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BKCL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	10.72%	12.60%	15.02%	7.91%
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO in my portfolio?

BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCL.TO or HXQ.TO?

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCL.TO or HXQ.TO?

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.68% for BKCL.TO.

What is the main difference between BKCL.TO and HXQ.TO?

BKCL.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.68% for BKCL.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.