BKCH vs. TSXU
BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). BKCH is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
BKCH vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 38.46% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
BKCH
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 38.46%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 99.88%
- 3Y*
- 56.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCH vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 38.46% | -26.23% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCH and TSXU is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCH vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
BKCH
TSXU
BKCH vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 4.53 | -4.50 |
Drawdowns
BKCH vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -35.62% | -56.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -0.92% | -32.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.13% | -10.56% | -51.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.25% | — | — |
Volatility
BKCH vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.90% | 78.68% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.43% | 78.68% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.43% | 78.68% | -3.25% |
BKCH vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCH vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 1.44% | 2.00% | 7.61% | 2.33% | 1.29% | 4.28% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCH and TSXU have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.20% for TSXU.
BKCH is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for BKCH and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer