BKCH vs. NODE

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BKCH is passively managed, while NODE is actively managed. Over the past year, BKCH returned 23.59% vs 27.40% for NODE. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NODE.

Performance

BKCH vs. NODE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than NODE's 12.65% return.

BKCH

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: -3.07%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 1Y: 23.59%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: -5.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.79%

NODE

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -2.87%
• 6M: 6.61%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 1Y: 27.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	$2.64M	$3.41M	$7.65M
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	$311.08K	$301.08K	$482.40K

BKCH vs. NODE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	6.75%	46.07%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	12.65%	32.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and NODE is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.95

The correlation between BKCH and NODE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. NODE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 19
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 15

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 23
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCH vs. NODE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCH	NODE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.54	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.08	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.13	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	0.78	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	1.62	-0.92

BKCH vs. NODE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the NODE Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCH and NODE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. NODE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than NODE's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and NODE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	NODE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-35.35%	-56.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	-35.35%	-20.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.82%	-17.53%	-31.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.52%	-11.40%	-50.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.88%	16.94%	+16.94%

Volatility

BKCH vs. NODE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) at 20.06%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NODE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	NODE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	20.06%	+5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.54%	38.97%	+14.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.14%	50.68%	+22.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.43%	47.29%	+28.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.58%	47.29%	+28.29%

BKCH vs. NODE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NODE's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCH vs. NODE - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than NODE's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.79%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	0.99%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and NODE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BKCH and NODE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BKCH or NODE?

BKCH has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to NODE (20.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCH dropped -91.80% vs NODE's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or NODE?

On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 27.40% vs 23.59% for BKCH. On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NODE has been the lower-risk option at 20.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCH or NODE?

Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 27.40% return vs 23.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or NODE?

BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or NODE?

BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.99% for NODE.

What is the main difference between BKCH and NODE?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 0.69% for NODE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NODE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.