BKCH vs. COZX
BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Blockchain fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain Index, while COZX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. BKCH is passively managed, while COZX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for COZX.
Performance
BKCH vs. COZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than COZX's 63.44% return.
BKCH
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -19.29%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
COZX
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- -39.40%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- YTD
- 63.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCH vs. COZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 5.51% | -35.79% |
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF | 63.44% | -61.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCH and COZX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCH vs. COZX — Risk / Return Rank
BKCH
COZX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKCH vs. COZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKCH | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKCH vs. COZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than COZX's maximum drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and COZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCH | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -70.44% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.42% | -46.61% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.67% | -40.67% | -21.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.29% | — | — |
Volatility
BKCH vs. COZX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCH | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.34% | 139.11% | -68.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.26% | 139.11% | -63.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.27% | 139.11% | -63.84% |
BKCH vs. COZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COZX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCH vs. COZX - Dividend Comparison
BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while COZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 1.81% | 2.00% | 7.61% | 2.33% | 1.29% | 4.28% |
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCH and COZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.
BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for COZX.
BKCH is categorized as Blockchain, while COZX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 1.30% for COZX.
Find the right allocation for BKCH and COZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer