BKCH vs. COZX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Blockchain fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain Index, while COZX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. BKCH is passively managed, while COZX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for COZX.

Performance

BKCH vs. COZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than COZX's 58.92% return.

BKCH

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: -3.07%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 1Y: 23.59%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: -5.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.79%

COZX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 11.06%
• YTD: 58.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	$2.64M	$3.41M	$7.65M
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	$399.07K	$667.11K	$1.75M

BKCH vs. COZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	6.75%	-35.79%
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	58.92%	-61.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and COZX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. COZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 19
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 15

COZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCH vs. COZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCH	COZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	—	—

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. COZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than COZX's maximum drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and COZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	COZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-70.44%	-21.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.82%	-48.09%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.52%	-41.34%	-20.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	COZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.14%	151.65%	-78.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.43%	151.65%	-76.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.58%	151.65%	-76.07%

BKCH vs. COZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COZX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCH vs. COZX - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while COZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.79%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and COZX in my portfolio?

BKCH and COZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or COZX?

On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or COZX?

BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or COZX?

BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for COZX.

What is the main difference between BKCH and COZX?

BKCH is categorized as Blockchain, while COZX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 1.30% for COZX.