BKCG.L vs. SILG.L
BKCG.L (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCG.L returned 56.44%/yr vs 45.51%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKCG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.
Performance
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCG.L achieves a 35.75% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.62% return.
BKCG.L
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 35.75%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 105.28%
- 3Y*
- 56.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 98.68%
- 3Y*
- 45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCG.L Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 35.75% | 23.16% | 6.98% | 308.24% | -70.95% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.62% | 153.98% | 13.53% | -6.34% | -8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCG.L and SILG.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BKCG.L
SILG.L
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.16 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 7.69 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.98 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.68 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCG.L drawdown since its inception was -82.56%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -32.00% | -50.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.08% | -30.90% | -23.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.72% | -30.90% | -26.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.72% | -24.56% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.37% | -12.52% | -30.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.84% | 12.74% | +17.10% |
Volatility
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) have volatilities of 19.30% and 18.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 18.48% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.66% | 39.95% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.15% | 49.23% | +17.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 39.40% | +35.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 39.40% | +35.14% |
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKCG.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKCG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
BKCG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. BKCG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.
Find the right allocation for BKCG.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer