BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L
BKCG.L (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and ESIT.L (iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Global X and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCG.L returned 56.44%/yr vs 24.77%/yr for ESIT.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKCG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIT.L.
Performance
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCG.L achieves a 35.75% return, which is significantly lower than ESIT.L's 51.37% return.
BKCG.L
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 35.75%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 105.28%
- 3Y*
- 56.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIT.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 20.73%
- YTD
- 51.37%
- 6M
- 48.42%
- 1Y
- 65.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- —
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCG.L Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 35.75% | 23.16% | 6.98% | 308.24% | -77.39% |
ESIT.L iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 51.37% | 14.83% | 2.77% | 32.26% | -11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCG.L and ESIT.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
BKCG.L
ESIT.L
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCG.L | ESIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 5.60 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 14.10 | -10.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCG.L | ESIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.68 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.72 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCG.L drawdown since its inception was -82.56%, which is greater than ESIT.L's maximum drawdown of -37.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG.L and ESIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCG.L | ESIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -37.50% | -45.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.08% | -11.71% | -42.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.72% | -24.87% | -32.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.72% | -0.16% | -25.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.37% | -11.52% | -31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.84% | 4.66% | +25.18% |
Volatility
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) at 9.42%. This indicates that BKCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCG.L | ESIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 9.42% | +9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.66% | 19.85% | +25.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.15% | 24.48% | +42.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 25.01% | +49.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 24.64% | +49.90% |
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIT.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCG.L vs. ESIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKCG.L nor ESIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCG.L and ESIT.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG.L and 0.18% for ESIT.L.
Find the right allocation for BKCG.L and ESIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer