BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L
BKCG.L (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and AQWG.L (Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AQWG.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCG.L returned 56.44%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for AQWG.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCG.L achieves a 35.75% return, which is significantly higher than AQWG.L's -0.99% return.
BKCG.L
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 35.75%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 105.28%
- 3Y*
- 56.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQWG.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCG.L Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 35.75% | 23.16% | 6.98% | 308.24% | -77.39% |
AQWG.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF | -0.99% | 5.17% | 7.79% | 18.26% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCG.L and AQWG.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.30 |
The correlation between BKCG.L and AQWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BKCG.L
AQWG.L
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.21 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 0.52 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.18 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCG.L drawdown since its inception was -82.56%, which is greater than AQWG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG.L and AQWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -23.03% | -59.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.08% | -11.23% | -42.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.72% | -17.73% | -39.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.72% | -9.71% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.37% | -7.35% | -36.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.84% | 4.49% | +25.35% |
Volatility
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that BKCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 3.98% | +15.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.66% | 9.96% | +35.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.15% | 13.03% | +54.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 15.00% | +59.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.54% | 15.00% | +59.54% |
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKCG.L and AQWG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
BKCG.L vs. AQWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKCG.L nor AQWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCG.L and AQWG.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCG.L and AQWG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
BKCG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while AQWG.L is Water Equities. BKCG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AQWG.L tracks S&P Global Water TR.
Find the right allocation for BKCG.L and AQWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer