PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BK.TO vs. FCUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Banc Corp. (BK.TO) and Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BK.TO is traded in CAD, while FCUV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FCUV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BK.TO achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than FCUV's -90.97% return.


BK.TO

1D
0.96%
1M
9.25%
YTD
17.44%
6M
34.81%
1Y
95.87%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
27.09%
10Y*
19.90%

FCUV

1D
-4.91%
1M
-30.54%
YTD
-90.97%
6M
-98.03%
1Y
-98.16%
3Y*
-82.91%
5Y*
-71.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BK.TO
Canadian Banc Corp.
17.44%81.62%27.41%-8.06%10.89%72.81%-3.53%-0.31%
FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.
-90.97%-77.92%-73.97%-66.59%-22.50%150.85%-31.76%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BK.TO and FCUV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.06

Fundamentals

EPS

BK.TO:

CA$8.60

FCUV:

-$7.91

PS Ratio

BK.TO:

2.88

FCUV:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

BK.TO:

CA$237.08M

FCUV:

$387.46K

Gross Profit (TTM)

BK.TO:

CA$232.83M

FCUV:

-$110.55K

EBITDA (TTM)

BK.TO:

CA$318.39M

FCUV:

-$5.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BK.TO vs. FCUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BK.TO
BK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FCUV
FCUV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FCUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Banc Corp. (BK.TO) and Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BK.TOFCUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.14

0.70

+1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.67

-1.00

+10.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.14

-1.50

+39.64

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.27, which is higher than the FCUV Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BK.TO and FCUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BK.TOFCUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.27

-0.63

+5.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.48

-0.37

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

-0.34

-0.26

Drawdowns

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BK.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FCUV drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BK.TO and FCUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BK.TOFCUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-99.94%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-98.56%

+88.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.64%

-99.67%

+74.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-99.94%

+74.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.67%

-99.94%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.91%

-67.77%

-32.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

65.30%

-62.78%

Volatility

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Banc Corp. (BK.TO) is 5.63%, while Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) has a volatility of 38.44%. This indicates that BK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BK.TOFCUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

38.44%

-32.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

131.04%

-115.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

156.44%

-138.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

192.07%

-173.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

186.88%

-161.39%

Dividends

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Dividend Comparison

BK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, while FCUV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BK.TO
Canadian Banc Corp.
11.73%11.36%14.44%17.99%15.91%9.13%7.72%10.49%13.19%9.13%7.82%12.97%
FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BK.TO vs. FCUV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Banc Corp. and Focus Universal Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
17.89M
28.69K
(BK.TO) Total Revenue
(FCUV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BK.TO values in CAD, FCUV values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BK.TO and FCUV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BK.TO and FCUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer