PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJAN vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BJAN vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BJAN vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than DMAX's -0.26% return.


BJAN

1D
0.81%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
1.26%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BJAN vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BJAN vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJAN
BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJAN vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJANDMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

2.25

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

3.38

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.51

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.94

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

19.00

-10.55

BJAN vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJAN and DMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJANDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.25

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.70

-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between BJAN and DMAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BJAN vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.66%
DMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF
1.18%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BJAN vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and DMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BJANDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-3.37%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-2.00%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-0.86%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-0.42%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

0.41%

+1.40%

Volatility

BJAN vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that BJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BJANDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

0.99%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

1.82%

+4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

3.45%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.00%

3.56%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

3.56%

+10.63%