BIVIX vs. LSEIX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and LSEIX (Persimmon Long/Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 13.32%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for LSEIX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for LSEIX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -6.05% return, which is significantly lower than LSEIX's 9.11% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 7.92%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
LSEIX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -6.05% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
LSEIX Persimmon Long/Short Fund | 9.11% | 12.02% | 17.36% | 15.70% | -9.95% | 14.67% | 8.13% | 5.28% | -6.10% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and LSEIX is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BIVIX and LSEIX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. LSEIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
LSEIX
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVIX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 4.52 | -4.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 17.58 | -17.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, which is greater than LSEIX's maximum drawdown of -19.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and LSEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -19.92% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.95% | -3.90% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -13.63% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -13.63% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | 0.00% | -11.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -4.02% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.85% | 1.00% | +8.85% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) at 2.77%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.20% | 2.77% | +14.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.03% | 5.67% | +20.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.79% | 8.65% | +21.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 10.91% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 10.68% | +7.34% |
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LSEIX's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. LSEIX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while LSEIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.34% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSEIX Persimmon Long/Short Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.23% | 3.49% | 6.18% | 0.00% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and LSEIX have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to LSEIX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -26.95% vs LSEIX's -19.92%.
LSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and LSEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer