PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIVIX vs. CDAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than CDAZX's 8.42% return.


BIVIX

1D
-4.48%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-13.33%
6M
-9.90%
1Y
-7.34%
3Y*
-4.36%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

CDAZX

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.46%
YTD
8.42%
6M
7.86%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIVIX
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class
-13.33%4.63%-8.81%16.80%50.01%63.81%11.46%11.59%3.68%8.93%
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
8.42%19.20%19.75%3.90%1.31%20.14%-6.39%8.17%-12.03%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BIVIX and CDAZX is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017

0.10

The correlation between BIVIX and CDAZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIVIX vs. CDAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIVIX
BIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CDAZX
CDAZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CDAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CDAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIVIXCDAZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

2.70

-2.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.22

3.84

-4.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.51

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

3.48

-3.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.81

13.00

-13.81

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIVIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CDAZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIVIX and CDAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIVIXCDAZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

2.70

-2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.20

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.72

+0.13

Drawdowns

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum CDAZX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and CDAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIVIXCDAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-30.94%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.70%

-7.32%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

-8.54%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

-10.91%

-9.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.79%

-0.13%

-18.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-6.14%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

1.95%

+5.85%

Volatility

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Volatility Comparison

Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) at 4.04%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIVIXCDAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.08%

4.04%

+8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

7.38%

+12.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

9.45%

+14.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

9.20%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

10.04%

+7.05%

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CDAZX's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIVIX vs. CDAZX - Dividend Comparison

BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CDAZX's 21.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIVIX
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class
2.53%2.20%3.95%20.15%27.91%16.08%3.15%3.19%4.79%1.21%
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
21.47%23.28%10.21%1.58%11.48%6.28%0.00%0.79%50.33%3.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIVIX and CDAZX have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIVIX has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to CDAZX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -20.70% vs CDAZX's -30.94%.

CDAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIVIX and CDAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer