BIV vs. DDV
BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. BIV is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BIV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
BIV vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.46% return.
BIV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 1.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.77%
DDV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.25M | $129.17M | $122.60M | |
| $77.01K | $47.65K | $101.82K |
BIV vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.71% | 0.26% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.46% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIV and DDV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIV vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
BIV
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIV vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIV vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -1.92% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -0.18% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -0.34% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility
BIV vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 2.64% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 2.64% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.50% | 2.64% | +2.86% |
BIV vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BIV vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.32% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.62% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIV and DDV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for BIV and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer