PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIV vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIV vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 18.26% return.


BIV

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.89%

AVGV

1D
0.75%
1M
2.45%
YTD
18.26%
6M
18.32%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.06%8.52%1.57%3.01%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
18.26%22.57%11.26%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and AVGV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIV vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIVAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.48

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

17.45

-13.55

BIV vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIV vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIVAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-17.03%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-8.12%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-2.28%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

2.08%

-0.98%

Volatility

BIV vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.45%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIVAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

4.55%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

10.35%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03%

13.36%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

15.04%

-8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

15.04%

-9.53%

BIV vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIV vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than AVGV's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
2.45%1.98%2.32%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.21%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIV and AVGV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to BIV (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 37.65% vs 4.61% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 37.65% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.45% for AVGV.

BIV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while AVGV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIV and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer