BITW vs. MSBT
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITW tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
BITW vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BITW
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- 1Y
- -33.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -14.96%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -9.07% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -11.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and MSBT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
MSBT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -26.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -26.46% | -70.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.45% | -21.40% | -49.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -8.18% | -61.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.38% | — | — |
Volatility
BITW vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 36.79% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 36.79% | +28.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.37% | 36.79% | +71.58% |
BITW vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITW nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BITW and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.
BITW and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for BITW and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer